MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406255697 · doi:10.13052/2024.aces.j.391009

Wideband Cup Dielectric Resonator Antenna With Stable Omnidirectional Patterns

2024· article· en· W4406255697 on OpenAlexaff
Shuxin Zheng, Nan Yang, Xiaoming Chen, Zhenyuan Zhang, Bingyi Qian, Ahmed A. Kishk

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal (ACES) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOmnidirectional antennaWidebandDielectric resonator antennaAntenna (radio)AcousticsResonatorMaterials scienceTelecommunicationsComputer sciencePhysicsOpticsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A wideband omnidirectional cup dielectric resonator antenna (CDRA) is designed by utilizing three modes (DR TM01δ, coil, and monopole modes) for the first time. It deploys the modified coil feeding structure comprising four coil segments and two close-by probes. The four coil segments provide an equivalent magnetic-current loop and the two probes act as an electric monopole. Thus, the modified feeding structure can excite the DR TM01δ mode and two neighbor resonances extending the operating bandwidth. All of these modes have omnidirectional characteristics. To verify the idea, a CDRA is designed, fabricated, and measured. The CDRA is 0.61λ0×0.32λ0 (where λ0 is the free-space wavelength at the center frequency) with a bandwidth of 67.7% (3.28-6.64 GHz). The antenna has stable omnidirectional radiation patterns, high radiation efficiencies, and a low cross-polarized level within the operating bandwidth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal (ACES)Same topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207