MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406265540 · doi:10.1109/sips62058.2024.00009

MemNAS: Super-net Neural Architecture Search for Memristor-based DNN Accelerators

2024· article· en· W4406265540 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemristorComputer scienceArchitectureArtificial neural networkComputer architectureArtificial intelligenceEngineeringElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Processing-in-memory (PiM) is an emerging technology that is particularly attractive for deep neural networks (DNN), providing a reduced power consumption at the price of non-idealities in the computations. Furthermore, the PiM platform offers additional parameters to optimize power consumption and non-idealities' effects on computations. However, PiM parameters may need to be tuned differently for each DNN model. In this work, we consider jointly optimizing the DNN architecture and some PiM parameters to improve the Pareto front of DNN performance and power consumption. This paper reports the results of neural architecture search (NAS) experiments on a Once-for-all (OFA) ResNet50 on ImageNet1K and finds that more power efficient DNN models can be identified with the same computational cost as the original OFA method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207