Partitioned Successive-Cancellation List Flip Decoding of Polar Codes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recently proposed Successive-Cancellation List Flip (SCLF) decoding algorithm for polar codes improves the error-correcting performance of state-of-the-art SC List (SCL) decoding. However, it comes at the cost of a higher complexity. In this paper, we propose the Partitioned SCLF (PSCLF) decoding algorithm, an algorithm that divides a word in partitions and applies SCLF decoding to each partition separately. Compared to SCLF, PSCLF allows early termination but is more susceptible to cyclic-redundancy check (CRC) collisions. In order to maximize the coding gain, a new partition design tailored to PSCLF is proposed as well as the possibility to support different CRC lengths. Numerical results show that the proposed PSCLF algorithm has an error-correction performance gain of up to 0.15 dB with respect to SCLF. Moreover, the proposed CRC structure permits to mitigate the error-correction loss at low frame-error rate (FER) due to CRC collisions, showing a gain of 0.2 dB at a FER of 10–4with respect to the regular CRC structure. The average execution time of PSCLF is shown to be 1.5 times lower than that of SCLF, and matches the latency of SCL at FER = 4.10−3and lower.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".