MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multipath Routing Compatible Congestion Control

2024· article· en· W4406266770 on OpenAlexaff
Tianfang Chang, Lin Cai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultipath routingComputer scienceMultipath propagationComputer networkRouting (electronic design automation)Network congestionDynamic Source RoutingRouting protocol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The evolution of network applications poses significant challenges to network service provisioning. Multipath routing and packet spraying techniques have become crucial in networks. TCP performance declines sharply on multipath setups where significant packet reordering occurs, as unordered transmissions are misinterpreted as packet loss and congestion signals. We propose the Multipath Routing Compatible (MPRC) congestion control, which utilizes the delay-sensitive Fast Retransmission Timeout (FastRTO) to decouple reordering from loss signals and enhance loss detection. This modification optimizes congestion window adjustments in multipath environments and handles packet reordering effectively, ensuring stable TCP throughput across multipath settings. Our algorithm was implemented on the NS-3 simulator platform and compared with other congestion control algorithms across various network topologies, in both single-path and multipath routing scenarios. The results demonstrate that MPRC can handle both sporadic and persistent packet reordering, ensuring steady throughput in multipath routing environments while maintaining compatibility and fairness in bandwidth competition, which paves the way for efficient congestion control adopting multi-path routing networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207