An Efficient Federated Learning Framework for IoT Intrusion Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The exponential growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystems has raised significant cybersecurity concerns. Deep learning (DL)-based methods have shown promising performance in detecting potential cyber threats in IoT networks. However, as these methods often involve data centralization, they can pose serious data privacy issues for IoT users and increase the communication burden of local networks. Federated learning (FL), as a distributed learning paradigm, enables privacy-preserving training of IoT intrusion detection models by requiring only model updates from IoT devices. However, the resource-constrained nature of IoT devices can significantly decrease FL training efficiencies, such as increased training latency and delayed convergence speed. Moreover, the data heterogeneous issues of IoT devices can also impact the accuracy and robustness of the trained model. To address these challenges, we propose an efficient FL framework, FedKD-Prox, based on federated proximal (FedProx) and knowledge distillation (KD). To improve the prediction accuracy within a limited time budget, the proposed framework aims to efficiently exploit the computation capability of the IoT trainers, reduce the communication overhead of FL, and alleviate the impact of heterogeneous data issues. The simulation results show that FedKD-Prox achieves higher accuracy and improves the robustness of the trained intrusion detection model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".