Stackelberg Game Based Performance Optimization in Digital Twin Assisted Federated Learning over NOMA Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite its advantage of preserving data privacy, federated learning (FL) could suffer from the limited computation resources of the distributed clients particularly when they are connected by wireless networks. By imitating the distributed resources effectively, digital twin (DT) shows great potential in eliminating the straggler issue in FL. In this paper, we leverage DT in the FL framework over non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) network, where DT deployed at the server can assist FL training process. To minimize the total latency and energy consumption in the proposed system, we formulate a Stackelberg game by considering clients and the server as the leader and the follower, respectively. Specifically, the leader aims to minimize the energy consumption via the optimization of DT mapping data ratio and resource allocation, while the objective of the follower is to minimize the total latency during FL training by optimally allocating DT computation resource. The Stackelberg equilibrium is considered to obtain the optimal solutions. We first derive the closed-form solution for the follower-level problem and include it in the leader-level problem which is then solved through the deep reinforcement learning (DRL) method. Simulation results verify the superior performance of the proposed scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".