MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406267791 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0297754

Quantifying spectral information about source separation in multisource odour plumes

2025· article· en· W4406267791 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sina Tootoonian, Aaron C. True, Elle Stark, John P. Crimaldi, Andreas T. Schaefer

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Pheromone Research and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFrancis Crick InstituteWellcome TrustMedical Research CouncilWellcomeNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEddySpectral densityA priori and a posterioriRange (aeronautics)Biological systemStatistical physicsSpatial correlationTemporal scalesChaoticPhysicsStatisticsComputer scienceMathematicsTurbulenceArtificial intelligenceMeteorologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Odours released by objects in natural environments can contain information about their spatial locations. In particular, the correlation of odour concentration timeseries produced by two spatially separated sources contains information about the distance between the sources. For example, mice are able to distinguish correlated and anti-correlated odour fluctuations at frequencies up to 40 Hz, while insect olfactory receptor neurons can resolve fluctuations exceeding 100 Hz. Can this high-frequency acuity support odour source localization? Here we answer this question by quantifying the spatial information about source separation contained in the spectral constituents of correlations. We used computational fluid dynamics simulations of multisource plumes in two-dimensional chaotic flow environments to generate temporally complex, covarying odour concentration fields. By relating the correlation of these fields to the spectral decompositions of the associated odour concentration timeseries, and making simplifying assumptions about the statistics of these decompositions, we derived analytic expressions for the Fisher information contained in the spectral components of the correlations about source separation. We computed the Fisher information for a broad range of frequencies and source separations for three different source arrangements and found that high frequencies were more informative than low frequencies when sources were close relative to the sizes of the large eddies in the flow. We observed a qualitatively similar effect in an independent set of simulations with different geometry, but not for surrogate data with a similar power spectrum to our simulations but in which all frequencies were a priori equally informative. Our work suggests that the high-frequency acuity of olfactory systems may support high-resolution spatial localization of odour sources. We also provide a model of the distribution of the spectral components of correlations that is accurate over a broad range of frequencies and source separations. More broadly, our work establishes an approach for the quantification of the spatial information in odour concentration timeseries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicInsect Pheromone Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207