MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406268098 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5397195/v1

Hierarchical Neurocognitive Model of Externalizing and Internalizing Comorbidity

2025· preprint· en· W4406268098 on OpenAlexaff
Tianye Jia, Chao Xie, Shitong Xiang, Yueyuan Zheng, Chun Shen, Yuzhu Li, Wei Cheng, Nilakshi Vaidya, Zuo Zhang, Lauren Robinson, Jeanne Winterer, Yuning Zhang, Sinéad King, Gareth J. Barker, Arun L.W. Bokde, Rüdiger Brühl, Hedi Kebir, Dongtao Wei, Éric Artiges, Marina Bobou, M. John Broulidakis, Tobias Banaschewski, Andreas Becker, Christian Büchel, Patricia Conrod, Tahmine Fadai, Herta Flor, Antoine Grigis, Yvonne Grimmer, Hugh Garavan, Penny Gowland, Andreas Heinz, Corinna Insensee, Viola Kappel, Hervé Lemaître, Jean‐Luc Martinot, Marie‐Laure Paillère Martinot, Betteke Maria van Noort, Frauke Nees, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos, Jani Penttilä, Luise Poustka, Juliane H. Fröhner, Ulrike Schmidt, Julia Sinclair, Michael N. Smolka, Maren Struve, Henrik Walter, Robert Whelan, Jiang Qiu, Peng Xie, Barbara J. Sahakian, Trevor W. Robbins, Sylvane Desrivières, Günter Schumann, Jianfeng Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Research Topics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersMedical Research CouncilFédération pour la Recherche sur le CerveauFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeAgence Nationale de la RechercheMission Interministérielle de Lutte Contre les Drogues et les Conduites AddictivesUK Research and InnovationEli Lilly and CompanyScience Foundation IrelandEconomic and Social Research CouncilEuropean CommissionInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleUniversity of OxfordFondation de FranceBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftArts and Humanities Research CouncilKing's College LondonNational Institutes of HealthFondation de l'Avenir pour la Recherche Médicale Appliquée
KeywordsNeurocognitiveComorbidityPsychologyExternalizationCognitive psychologyClinical psychologyCognitionPsychiatrySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.312
GPT teacher head0.552
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicMental Health Research TopicsFrench-language works237,207