MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406271723 · doi:10.32316/hse-rhe.2024.5347

Julia Erhart, The Children's Hour

2025· article· fr· W4406271723 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Liz Millward

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducation · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

challenging colonial ways of organizing information" (66).And as the title suggests, McCracken and Hogan-Stacey have the future in mind with this text, so in this way we can consider this work as prefigurative: it not only attempts to guide and orient archival impulses and practices in and into the future, but it also suggests that if we are able to imagine respectful, ethical, relational archival practices in that future landscape, then there is no reason why we cannot or should not be doing them now in the present.This book invites the reader to do this work or, simply, "the work" -readers should accept the invitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.013
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducationSame topicMusic History and CultureFrench-language works237,207