MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transient vortex-induced vibrations of a cylinder released from rest

2025· article· en· W4406275578 on OpenAlexafffund
Nikhilesh Tumuluru Ramesh, Serhiy Yarusevych, Chris Morton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluids and Structures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRest (music)Transient (computer programming)VibrationCylinderVortex-induced vibrationVortex sheddingVortexMechanicsPhysicsKármán vortex streetAcousticsClassical mechanicsStructural engineeringMathematicsEngineeringGeometryComputer scienceReynolds numberTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transient response of an elastically-mounted rigid cylinder released from rest in a steady freestream is investigated experimentally through simultaneous displacement and two-component velocity field measurements in conjunction with force estimation. The Reynolds number is maintained constant at R e ≈ 4,400, while the reduced velocity is varied between U ∗ ≈ 4.5 and 11.5. The amplitude response indicates distinct transient behavior across all response branches, including a notable amplitude overshoot in the initial branch and continuous amplitude growth to quasi-steady state in the upper and lower branches. Following cylinder release, forcing is shown to transition from purely von Kármán frequency to nonlinear forcing, and comparisons to a linear oscillator show key differences in system behavior during this transition. Following lock-in, the time taken to attain quasi-steady state increases, while the maximum amplitude growth rate decreases with U ∗ . The observed differences in the transient amplitude growth rate are linked to distinct changes in the forcing characteristics, primarily driven by the phase difference between forcing and cylinder displacement. The presented analysis of the transient flow development reveals a close relationship between the timing of vortex shedding and the forcing phase difference. Additionally, the mechanisms underlying the transition from initial von Kármán shedding to quasi-steady lock-in behavior, highlighted by notable changes in wake characteristics, are identified for transients in each response branch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluids and StructuresSame topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207