MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406276151 · doi:10.1109/mmm.2024.3486596

Automated Neural-Network-Based Model Generation Algorithms for Microwave Applications

2025· article· en· W4406276151 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave Magazine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Computational Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkMicrowaveComputer scienceAlgorithmElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automated Model Generation (AMG) algorithms are an important technique for creating Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models in microwave design automation. AMG integrates all the subtasks in ANN development into a unified automated algorithm. The assessments of the ANN training phenomena related to under-learning, over-learning and good-learning are automated and the quantitative links between the accuracy of the ANN model, the amount/distribution of training/testing data, and the size of the neural network are established. In this way, the AMG algorithm automatically creates an ANN model with user-desired accuracy, significantly reducing the human time required for modeling. This paper introduces the state of the art in AMG algorithms and its applications in microwave modeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it