MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406278796 · doi:10.1101/2025.01.10.632501

From spots to stripes: Evolution of pigmentation patterns in monkeyflowers via modulation of a reaction-diffusion system and its prepatterns

2025· preprint· en· W4406278796 on OpenAlexafffund
Mei Liang, Lee Ringham, Changning Ye, Yan Xu, Nathan Schaumburger, Mikolaj Cieslak, Michael L. Blinov, Przemysław Prusinkiewicz, Yao‐Wu Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Gene Expression Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institutes of HealthCanada First Research Excellence FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCoactivatorActivator (genetics)BiologyEvolutionary biologyGeneticsMYBGeneGene expressionTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY The reaction-diffusion (RD) system is widely assumed to account for many complex, self- organized pigmentation patterns in natural organisms. However, the specific configurations of such RD networks and how RD systems interact with positional information (i.e., prepatterns) that may specify the initiation conditions for the RD operation remain largely unknown. Here, we introduced a three-substance RD system underlying the formation of repetitive pigment spots and stripes in Mimulus flowers. It consists of an R2R3-MYB activator (NEGAN), an R3-MYB inhibitor (RTO), and a coactivator represented by two paralogous bHLH proteins. Through fine- scale genetic analyses, transgenic experiments, and computer simulations, we identified the causal loci contributing to the evolutionary transition from sparsely dispersed spots to longitudinal stripes. Genetic changes at these loci modulate the prepatterns of the activator and coactivator expression and the promoter activities of the inhibitor and one of the coactivator paralogs. Our findings highlight the importance of prepatterns towards a realistic description of RD systems in natural organisms, and reveal the genetic mechanism generating pattern variation through modulation of the kinetics of the RD system and its prepatterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPlant Gene Expression AnalysisFrench-language works237,207