MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406282621 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf055

WISDOM Project – XXII. A 5 per cent precision CO-dynamical supermassive black hole mass measurement in the galaxy NGC 383

2025· article· en· W4406282621 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hengyue Zhang, Martin Bureau, Ilaria Ruffa, Michele Cappellari, Timothy A. Davis, Pandora Dominiak, Jacob S Elford, Satoru Iguchi, Federico Lelli, M. Sarzi, Thomas G. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBalliol College, University of OxfordNational Institutes of Natural SciencesMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanJet Propulsion LaboratoryNational Research Council CanadaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCalifornia Institute of TechnologyEuropean School of OncologyNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsSupermassive black holeAstrophysicsGalaxyAstronomyBlack hole (networking)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We present a measurement of the supermassive black hole (SMBH) mass of the nearby lenticular galaxy NGC 383, based on Atacama Large Millimeter/sub-millimeter Array (ALMA) observations of the $^{12}$CO(2-1) emission line with an angular resolution of $0.050{\,\rm arcsec}\times 0.024{\,\rm arcsec}$ ($\approx 16\times 8$ pc$^2$). These observations spatially resolve the nuclear molecular gas disc down to $\approx 41\,300$ Schwarzschild radii and the SMBH sphere of influence by a factor of $\approx 24$ radially, better than any other SMBH mass measurement using molecular gas to date. The high resolution enables us to probe material with a maximum circular velocity of $\approx 1040$ km s$^{-1}$, even higher than those of the highest resolution SMBH mass measurements using megamasers. We detect a clear Keplerian increase (from the outside in) of the line-of-sight rotation velocities, a slight offset between the gas disc kinematic (i.e. the position of the SMBH) and morphological (i.e. the centre of the molecular gas emission) centres, an asymmetry of the innermost rotation velocity peaks and evidence for a mild position angle warp and/or non-circular motions within the central $\approx 0.3\,{\rm arcsec}$. By forward modelling the mass distribution and ALMA data cube, we infer an SMBH mass of $(3.58\pm 0.19)\times 10^9$ M$_\odot$ ($1\sigma$ confidence interval), more precise (5 per cent) but consistent within $\approx 1.4\sigma$ with the previous measurement using lower resolution molecular gas data. Our measurement emphasizes the importance of high spatial resolution observations for precise SMBH mass determinations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations→French-language works237,207→