MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406283031 · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljaf020

Prevalence of chronic hand eczema in adults: a cross-sectional survey of over 60 000 respondents from the general population of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK

2025· article· en· W4406283031 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christian Apfelbacher, Anthony Bewley, Sonja Molin, Maria Concetta Fargnoli, Lysel Brignoli, Bleuenn Rault, Jenny M. Norlin, Tea Skaaby, M.N. Crépy

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicContact Dermatitis and Allergies
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu HospitalQueen's University
FundersIncyteSanofiLEO PharmaPfizer
KeywordsMedicineEpidemiologyDemographyPopulationCross-sectional studyObservational studyConfidence intervalEthnic groupGerontologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The lack of attention paid to chronic hand eczema (CHE) and the lack of a specific International Classification of Diseases code for it may have limited assessment of its prevalence. To date, prevalence estimates have primarily been derived from (partly small) single-country studies. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the annual prevalence of self-reported physician-diagnosed CHE across sociodemographic characteristics in adults living in Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. METHODS: In the observational Chronic Hand Eczema epidemiology, Care, and Knowledge of real-life burden (CHECK) study, a questionnaire was administered to adults aged 18-69 years in the general population, recruited through online panels. Quotas and minor weighting adjustments were performed to ensure that the participants were representative of the general population with regard to sex, age, region, employment status, urban/rural setting and - in the UK only - ethnicity. Additional weights were applied to account for population size differences when aggregating country results. Information on self-reported physician-diagnosed CHE was collected. CHE was defined, in accordance with the European Society of Contact Dermatitis, as having had hand eczema continuously for ≥ 3 months or at least two flares in the past 12 months. The annual prevalence of CHE was determined for each country, and by subgroups of sex, age, employment and urban/rural setting. RESULTS: Of 60 131 participants, 2847 self-reported physician-diagnosed CHE, yielding an annual prevalence of 4.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.6-4.9]. Subgroup analyses revealed that the prevalence of CHE was significantly higher in women than in men [5.6% (95% CI 5.4-5.9) vs. 3.8% (95% CI 3.6-4.1); P < 0.001], in employed vs. unemployed people [5.3% (95% CI 5.1-5.6) vs. 3.3% (95% CI 3.1-3.6); P < 0.001] and in urban vs. rural residents [5.0% (95% CI 4.8-5.2) vs. 3.7% (95% CI 3.4-4.1); P < 0.001). Prevalence was highest in those aged 30-39 years (6.5%, 95% CI 6.0-7.0) and lowest in those aged 60-69 years (2.6%, 95% CI 2.3-3.0). CONCLUSIONS: This large multinational study is the first to assess the prevalence of CHE in Europe and Canada using a consistent definition across a broad geographical population. This study reveals that CHE is a common skin disease with annual prevalence of 4.7%, with a higher prevalence in women, people aged 30-39, employed people and those living in urban areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DermatologySame topicContact Dermatitis and AllergiesFrench-language works237,207