MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406285389 · doi:10.1061/jidedh.ireng-10330

Limits of Blue and Green Infrastructures to Adapt Actual Urban Drainage Systems to the Impact of Climate Change

2025· article· en· W4406285389 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Stormwater Management Solutions
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsClimate changeDrainageEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningGreen infrastructureGeographyRemote sensingGeologyEcologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urbanization over the last few decades has resulted in a rise of impervious surfaces in municipalities worldwide. This rise has led to an increase in stormwater runoff and a decrease in the capacity of existing urban drainage systems. Additionally, the projected increase in frequency and intensity of extreme rainfall events due to climate change further exacerbates the risk of urban flooding. In response to this challenge, many municipalities have begun implementing blue and green infrastructures (BGI) to mimic the natural hydrologic cycle and manage stormwater at its source. Although the benefits of BGI, such as bioretention cells, permeable pavement, blue roofs, and green roofs, have been demonstrated, their full potential remains uncertain. This raises the question of whether BGI, when utilized to the maximum potential, can effectively adapt our existing drainage infrastructures to the projected increases in extreme rainfall in a warmer climate. To address this question, a case study was conducted in the Pointes-aux-Trembles District, a 20-km2 urban catchment in Montreal. A calibrated stormwater management model [personnel computer storm water management model (PCSWMM)] was used to simulate various scenarios of BGI implementation, both individually and in combination without considering economic constraints. An extreme rainfall event was simulated under a warming climate to compare urban flooding between the existing urban drainage system and the different BGI scenarios. The results demonstrated the significant potential of BGI in adapting our existing drainage systems to climate change. In the simulated scenario of climate change impact, which resulted in a 136% increase in flood volume, the individual implementation scenarios offset between 20% and 118% of this increase. Furthermore, the combination scenarios achieved offsets of 162% and 167%, resulting in a better performance of the urban drainage systems (UDS) under climate change conditions with BGI practices than in historical conditions without any BGI practice. These findings strongly suggest that BGI practices should be considered as a crucial part of the adaptation solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it