MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406292635 · doi:10.1101/2025.01.10.24319101

Evaluating the biomedical and behavioural drivers of HIV-1 incidence decline in adolescent girls and young women in Uganda: A mathematical modelling study

2025· preprint· en· W4406292635 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Akullian, Victor Ssempijja, Dan Bridenbecker, Fred Nalugoda, Gertrude Nakigozi, John Santelli, Philip Kreniske, Larry W. Chang, Steven J. Reynolds, Robert Ssekubugu, Ronald H. Gray, Maria J. Wawer, Thomas C. Quinn, Ronald M. Galiwango, Will Probert, Jeff Imai-Eaton, Oliver Ratmann, Joseph Kagaayi, Christophe Fraser, Godfrey Kigozi, M. Kate Grabowski, David Serwadda

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)PsychologyGerontologyDemographyMedicineDevelopmental psychologySociologyFamily medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Recent declines in HIV incidence among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Africa are often attributed to the expansion of biomedical interventions such as antiretroviral therapy and voluntary medical male circumcision. However, changes in sexual behaviour may also play a critical role. Understanding the relative contributions of these factors is essential for developing strategies to sustain and further reduce HIV transmission. Methods: We conducted a mathematical modelling study of data from the Rakai Community Cohort Study (RCCS), an open, population-based cohort of 15- to 49-year-olds in 30 communities in Rakai, Uganda, to investigate the biomedical and behavioural drivers of HIV incidence decline in AGYW (15-24 years of age). We estimated changes in the HIV incidence rate between 2000-2019 using retrospective cohort data to validate our modelled incidence estimates. We ran modelled counterfactual scenarios to quantify the independent and combined effects (cumulative infections averted and difference in incidence rates) of antiretroviral therapy (ART), voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC), and delays in age of first sex (AFS) over historical (between 2000-2020) and projected (between 2000-2050) time horizons. Findings: Incidence in women 15-24 years of age declined by 83% between 2000-2019 (from 1.72 per 100 person-years in 2000 to 0.30 per 100 person-years in 2019), the largest reduction in incidence of all age groups of women. Increasing AFS over the last two decades (by 3 years in women and 2 years in men) was the largest contributor to incidence decline in women 15-19 years of age, averting 17% of cumulative infections between 2000-2020 and 37% between 2000-2050. Incidence in 15-19-year-old women was 69% lower in 2020 and 75% lower in 2050 compared to counterfactual scenarios without changes in AFS. ART scale-up contributed the most to incidence declines among women 20-24 years of age, averting 13% of infections between 2000-2020 and 43% of infections between 2000-2050. VMMC averted < 5% of infections in 15-24-year-olds to-date, with larger reductions in incidence between 2000-2050 in both 15-19 year-olds (13% reduction in cumulative infections) and 20-24 year-olds (22% of cumulative infections). ART, VMMC, and increasing AFS acted additively to reduce HIV incidence in AGYW, with little redundancy when combined. Interpretation: Our results provide strong support for maintaining both the protective changes in sexual behaviours and effective biomedical interventions to sustain continued reductions in HIV incidence among AGYW.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions→French-language works237,207→