MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406299694 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104019

Investigating lightweight recycled brick aggregate concrete incorporating EPS beads: Application to masonry units

2025· article· en· W4406299694 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRecycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersHigher Education Commission, Pakistan
KeywordsMasonryAggregate (composite)BrickMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringComposite materialCivil engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Lightweight recycled brick aggregate concrete was developed using waste bricks and EPS beads. • EPS beads replacement of fine aggregate resulted in lightweight concrete. • Mixtures ensured minimum compressive strength under acidic and saline environments. • Using recycled cooking oil as an admixture increased compressive strength. • The addition of coconut fibers improved the modulus of rupture. Construction and demolition (C&D) waste, including burnt clay bricks and concrete, combined with non-degradable industrial waste such as expanded polystyrene (EPS), presents a significant global disposal challenge. Recycling C&D waste into concrete aggregates offers a sustainable solution, while incorporating EPS in lightweight concrete production supports eco-friendly construction. This study focuses on developing lightweight recycled brick aggregate concrete (LRBAC) using recycled brick aggregate (RBA) and EPS beads, specifically designed for partition walls in seismic structures, where reduced weight enhances structural performance. To minimize the carbon footprint, cement was partially replaced with fly ash at 33%, 50%, and 67%. Coconut fibers (15 mm length) were added to mitigate the reduction in mechanical properties caused by EPS and cement replacement. Used cooking oil (UCO) was employed as a sustainable alternative to commercial superplasticizers, and its impact on mechanical and durability properties was assessed. Key properties, including density, modulus of elasticity (MOE), compressive strength, and modulus of rupture (MOR), were evaluated in accordance with ASTM C129 standards for lightweight masonry units. Durability was assessed through water absorption tests and exposure to severe weathering, including cyclic ponding in 5% sulfuric acid and supersaturated brine solutions. The results show that despite that EPS beads addition and exposure to harsh weathering decreased the mechanical and durability properties, LRBAC specimens satisfied the ASTM C129 criteria for lightweight concrete masonry units. Moreover, LRBAC incorporating EPS and FA are less costly and have lower carbon footprint, highlighting the benefit of using C&D and industrial waste for production of sustainable lightweight concrete for masonry units.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it