Impact of Indices on Stock Price Volatility of BRICS Countries During Crises: Comparative Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to identify the common indices having an impact on the SPV of BRICS countries during crises. To address this, the monthly data retrieved from the database of the Global Economic Monitor (GEM), World Bank, IMF International Financial Statistics data, and OECD in the period of January 2000 to December 2023 are analyzed in two phases. In the first phase, DM classification techniques are applied to the data to identify the best common classification technique in order to use this technique in the second phase to compare the results with Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) results. In the second phase, to account for the global financial crisis and COVID-19 crisis, the sample period is divided into two sub-periods. For those sub-periods, MLR and the best classification technique that was found in the first phase are utilized to find the common indices that have an impact on the stock price volatility during individual and both crises. The findings indicate that the Random Tree method commonly classified the data among the seven classification techniques. Regarding MLR results, no common indices were identified during the global financial crisis or the COVID-19 crisis. However, based on Random Tree classifications, the CPI price percent, National Currency, and CPI index for all items were common during the global financial crisis, whereas only the CPI price percent was common during the COVID-19 crisis. While some common indices were observed in individual crises for specific countries, no indices were consistently found across both crises. This variation is attributed to the unique nature of each crisis and the diverse economic and socio-political structures of different countries. These findings provide valuable insights for financial institutions and investors to refine financial and policy decisions based on the specific characteristics of each crisis and the indices affecting each country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".