MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406308089 · doi:10.3390/ijfs13010008

Impact of Indices on Stock Price Volatility of BRICS Countries During Crises: Comparative Study

2025· article· en· W4406308089 on OpenAlex
Nursel Selver Ruzgar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Financial Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsVolatility (finance)Monetary economicsStock priceStock (firearms)Financial economicsInternational economicsEconometricsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to identify the common indices having an impact on the SPV of BRICS countries during crises. To address this, the monthly data retrieved from the database of the Global Economic Monitor (GEM), World Bank, IMF International Financial Statistics data, and OECD in the period of January 2000 to December 2023 are analyzed in two phases. In the first phase, DM classification techniques are applied to the data to identify the best common classification technique in order to use this technique in the second phase to compare the results with Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) results. In the second phase, to account for the global financial crisis and COVID-19 crisis, the sample period is divided into two sub-periods. For those sub-periods, MLR and the best classification technique that was found in the first phase are utilized to find the common indices that have an impact on the stock price volatility during individual and both crises. The findings indicate that the Random Tree method commonly classified the data among the seven classification techniques. Regarding MLR results, no common indices were identified during the global financial crisis or the COVID-19 crisis. However, based on Random Tree classifications, the CPI price percent, National Currency, and CPI index for all items were common during the global financial crisis, whereas only the CPI price percent was common during the COVID-19 crisis. While some common indices were observed in individual crises for specific countries, no indices were consistently found across both crises. This variation is attributed to the unique nature of each crisis and the diverse economic and socio-political structures of different countries. These findings provide valuable insights for financial institutions and investors to refine financial and policy decisions based on the specific characteristics of each crisis and the indices affecting each country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it