MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406309054 · doi:10.1016/j.nima.2025.170212

Development of a multi-layer silicon beta-ray spectrometer for beta spectrometry and dosimetry at CANDU power plants

2025· article· en· W4406309054 on OpenAlexafffund
Xingzhi Cheng, Benjamin Dyer, Andrei Hanu, Soo Hyun Byun

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsBruce Power (Canada)McMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCANDU Owners Group
KeywordsBETA (programming language)DosimetrySpectrometerBeta particleRadiochemistryMass spectrometrySiliconNuclear physicsNuclear engineeringMaterials scienceChemistryPhysicsNuclear medicineComputer scienceEngineeringOpticsOptoelectronicsChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radiation-induced cataractogenesis is a growing concern as a stochastic effect for workers exposed to a mixed beta-gamma radiation field observed at Canada Deuterium Uranium (CANDU) power plants. Accurate beta dosimetry to the lens of the eyes in a mixed field remains a challenge due to limitations in existing beta spectrometers. In this dissertation, a compact multi-layer Silicon Beta-ray Spectrometer (SBS) has been developed for beta spectrometry and dosimetry. Its design is based on the principle that the coincidence operations between silicon detectors make most gamma detection events be rejected, while beta detection events are saved in the beta energy region of 0.7 to 3 MeV. A prototype spectrometer consists of a collimator, an entrance window, a stack of silicon detectors, an interface board, and a quad-input pulse processing system. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to optimize the configuration of the detector stack and compute the spectrometer response matrices to beta and gamma radiation. To characterize the gamma rejection and beta spectrometric performance, comprehensive measurements were carried out for various mixed beta-gamma fields with different beta count rates and beta-gamma count ratios that were created by varying the positions of a 90Sr/90Y beta source and a137Cs gamma source. The coincidence spectra showed excellent gamma rejection performance in most energy regions above 250 keV, while notable gamma perturbation events were identified in the low energy region for the coincidence spectrum betweenthe first two detectors and the anti-coincidence spectrum of the front detector. Additional experiments with low-level waste samples highlighted the SBS’s enhanced detection capability for low activity sources thanks to background suppression. A custom microcontroller-based digital signal processing system was developed as a compact, cost-effective alternative to commercial systems. It supports onboard coincidence and achieved comparable performance in certain metrics, though issues in pulse processing and histogram updating affected low-energy event detection in specific channels. Finally, a fully Bayesian unfolding pipeline was built to derive the fluence spectra from measured coincidence spectra. Simulations validated its capability to unfold beta and gamma fluence spectra simultaneously, with promising results for beta-to-gamma ratios down to 0.1. However, performance degraded at lower beta-to-gamma ratio due to gamma perturbation, and application to lab measurements faced challenges from reduced coincidence efficiencies and calibration limitations. This work successfully demonstrated the SBS prototype as a key milestone. Extensive discussions for future improvements were given for the full SBS instrument.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated EquipmentSame topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207