MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406324024 · doi:10.1144/jgs2024-083

The Svanbergfjellet Formation: eukaryotic life in a Tonian Sea

2025· article· en· W4406324024 on OpenAlexaff
Sanaa Mughal, Alexie E.G. Millikin, Timothy M. Gibson, Alan D. Rooney, Nicholas J. Tosca, K. D. Bergmann, Justin V. Strauss, Ross P. Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Geological Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAll Souls College, University of OxfordRoyal SocietyNational Geographic SocietyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyPaleontologyGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exceptionally preserved organic-walled microfossils of the Svanbergfjellet Formation, Svalbard document the diversity of eukaryotes in a Tonian (1000–720 myr ago) shallow sea. We review this fossil Lagerstätte and re-sample it at the highest stratigraphic resolution to date. We place the Lagerstätte in an updated age model and evaluate fossil taphonomy. The Svanbergfjellet Formation is one of the most biodiverse units in the Tonian, c . 50% more diverse than the average fossiliferous Tonian unit. It notably preserves the green alga Proterocladus and the possible green alga Palaeastrum . These multicellular fossils, when combined with others elsewhere, suggest that green algae were well established in Tonian marine ecosystems, but substantially predate organic biomarkers that record a dominant green algal contribution to marine primary productivity only by the Ediacaran. Svanbergfjellet also includes several problematic taxa with complex multicellular morphologies (e.g. Jacutinema and Valkyria ) that require further investigation into their phylogenetic placement, but that could substantially add to the known diversity of crown eukaryotes in the Proterozoic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Geological SocietySame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207