MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406324034 · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100439

Enhancing climate action evaluation using artificial neural networks: An analysis of SDG 13

2025· article· en· W4406324034 on OpenAlexaff
Cosimo Magazzino, Zakaria Zoundi

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable Futures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Planning and Valuation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaGlobal Affairs Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceAction (physics)Computer scienceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to enhance the evaluation of climate-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), with a focus on SDG 13 ("Climate Action"), using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) methods. It examines seven critical 2023 SDG Global Index indexes to model and predict environmental performance. The innovative use of ANNs allows for capturing complex and non-linear interactions among sustainability indicators, surpassing traditional linear models. A key component of the research is the application of Garson's algorithm, which identifies the relative importance of each of the seven indexes in influencing climate outcomes. The study optimizes the ANN's parameters through a grid search, ensuring robust and precise predictions. This research offers valuable insights for policymakers and researchers aiming to improve climate action strategies by providing a more nuanced understanding of the factors driving environmental performance. The findings demonstrate the potential of advanced AI techniques in refining sustainability assessments and guiding more effective environmental policies. Key policy insights drawn from the study include expanding interventions aimed at promoting more sustainable consumption and production policies, given the significant contribution of SDG 12 in driving climate goals; reviewing the methods for measuring economic growth to account for the planetary crises; and increasing the use of AI tools to guide policymaking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSustainable FuturesSame topicUrban Planning and ValuationFrench-language works237,207