Effect of Loading and Carbonation on the Compressive Strength and Hydraulic Conductivity of Solidified Sand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Cement-based solidification/stabilization (S/S) techniques have been widely used to produce stable forms of contaminated soils and reduce the mobility of contaminants into the environment. However, information on the long-term performances of S/S under environmental conditions (i.e., variable loading and atmospheric carbon dioxide) remains sparse. In this study, a triaxial test setup was modified to simulate environmental conditions. The permeability and compressive strength of silica sand solidified with portland cement were measured at different stages of four scenarios involving carbonation only, axial strain only, carbonation followed by axial strain, and axial strain followed by carbonation. X-ray computed tomography (CT) was used to characterize the internal structure of the samples. Permeability and compressive strength results indicate that the axial strain accelerated the damage to the S/S specimens and increased their permeability. The deterioration due to the mechanical strain decreased in the presence of carbon dioxide. Consistent changes in microstructure were observed with the CT scan. The results indicate that the influence of stressors on the void size distribution, compressive strength, and permeability is complex and characterized by interactions between the stressors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".