MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406327575 · doi:10.1080/00102202.2025.2451412

Large Eddy Simulations of a Medium-Scale Ethanol Pool Fire Using Conditional Source-Term Estimation Including Coupled Soot Radiation Effects

2025· article· en· W4406327575 on OpenAlex
Ahmed M.K. Abdalhamid, Cécile Devaud, Elizabeth J. Weckman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCombustion Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSootTerm (time)Environmental scienceRadiationLarge eddy simulationScale (ratio)Medium termNuclear engineeringMaterials scienceCombustionAtmospheric sciencesMechanicsChemistryThermodynamicsPhysicsNuclear physicsTurbulenceEngineeringPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this paper is to assess the combined capabilities of Conditional Source-Term Estimation with radiation and soot modeling in large eddy simulations of a medium-scale ethanol pool fire. Tabulated detailed chemistry is implemented including radiative losses. The radiative transfer equation is solved with the weighted sum of gray gas models to determine the gaseous absorption. Two subgrid soot models are considered using the laminar smoke point concept. The first approach calculates the soot formation and oxidation rates corrected to account for turbulent effects. The second determines the soot reaction rates in conditional space using analytical functions and the filtered reaction rates are determined by convolution with the filtered mixture fraction density function. Predictions of the time-averaged and root mean square temperature, species mole fractions and soot mass fraction are compared with experimental measurements. Numerical temperatures agree well with experiments except in the fire plume where some overpredictions are observed. Species concentrations match the measurements with some discrepancies observed in the products farther downstream, partly explained by the experimental uncertainty. The peak soot predicted with the first model is in reasonable agreement with the experiments but is much lower using the second approach. These differences are explained by the differences in the turbulence soot chemistry treatment and calibration of empirical constants. However, here, soot has a limited impact on the temperature, flow and mixing fields due to low soot concentrations produced by ethanol. The radiative heat fluxes are reasonably well predicted. Further validation is needed with additional experimental soot data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it