High-density retinal signal deciphering in support of diagnosis in psychiatric disorders: A new paradigm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• The search for biomarkers in psychiatry started decades ago with major reported milestones in computational psychiatry and precision medicine. • Mappings of novel predictors demonstrate that meaningful classifiers are located in areas of the retinal signal that have never been investigated. • Novel patterns in retinal signals are richer in potential specific biomarkers than their current two-dimensional representations. • This novel approach provides better structured training data in classifications using supervised learning. • The plurality of deciphering approaches allows better discriminant power in selecting prediction models specific to complex pathologies. The search for biomarkers in psychiatry started decades ago with major reported milestones in the development of computational psychiatry and precision medicine. Prediction models have been suggested based upon components extracted from retinal signals and analyses of electroretinogram (ERG), with the objective of providing prediction metrics to support diagnoses. However, conventional ERG parameters lack detailed information to appropriately decipher retinal signals and extract specific descriptors that best describe such pathologies. We developed the concept of high-density retinal signal, with the specific target of modeling mathematical domains of information gathered from retinal signals and related clinical information. An interim analysis has been conducted in the framework of a multicenter clinical study, aiming to develop prediction models that differentiate between two major psychiatric disorders, schizophrenia and type 1 bipolar disorder. In order to select the best predictors within the entirety of the signals, and the full extent of the available information, in addition to using conventional ERG parameters, two new approaches for extracting non-conventional retinal signal descriptors were implemented. Mappings of predictors demonstrate that meaningful classifiers are located in areas of the retinal signal that have never been investigated before, allowing a multiplicity of biomarkers to be extracted, all well scattered within the entire volume of information, as opposed to the conventional ERG components which are very sparce and discrete. RSPA prediction models minimum accuracy was 79% and maximum 99% for training, and 68% and 90%, respectively, for testing, depending upon the model used, as compared to 73% and 87% for training, and 55% and 61% for the testing dataset with the prediction models using conventional ERG parameters alone. The prediction models with the highest testing performance were found using Ridge logistic regression with either photopic MA, ARMA or signal density polynomial coefficients predictors. Meaningful testing performances were also obtained with logistic regression (90%), neural network (88%) and SVM (86%) analysis methods. These results demonstrate that using only conventional ERG parameters is a very limited approach in prediction model development, because it excludes most of the retinal signal where many specific details are the most performing classifiers. Our findings support the concept of high-density retinal signal and its purpose, while many research groups attempt to decipher retinal signals to differentiate between complex pathologies, such as psychiatric disorders, to select biosignatures as objective evidence for their diagnoses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it