MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4406328679 · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2024.107373

High-density retinal signal deciphering in support of diagnosis in psychiatric disorders: A new paradigm

2025· article· en· W4406328679 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueBiomedical Signal Processing and Control · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueFractal and DNA sequence analysis
Établissements canadiensOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSIGNAL (programming language)Computer scienceRetinalPsychiatryRetinal DisorderParadigm shiftPsychologyData scienceNeuroscienceMedicineRetinaOphthalmologyPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

• The search for biomarkers in psychiatry started decades ago with major reported milestones in computational psychiatry and precision medicine. • Mappings of novel predictors demonstrate that meaningful classifiers are located in areas of the retinal signal that have never been investigated. • Novel patterns in retinal signals are richer in potential specific biomarkers than their current two-dimensional representations. • This novel approach provides better structured training data in classifications using supervised learning. • The plurality of deciphering approaches allows better discriminant power in selecting prediction models specific to complex pathologies. The search for biomarkers in psychiatry started decades ago with major reported milestones in the development of computational psychiatry and precision medicine. Prediction models have been suggested based upon components extracted from retinal signals and analyses of electroretinogram (ERG), with the objective of providing prediction metrics to support diagnoses. However, conventional ERG parameters lack detailed information to appropriately decipher retinal signals and extract specific descriptors that best describe such pathologies. We developed the concept of high-density retinal signal, with the specific target of modeling mathematical domains of information gathered from retinal signals and related clinical information. An interim analysis has been conducted in the framework of a multicenter clinical study, aiming to develop prediction models that differentiate between two major psychiatric disorders, schizophrenia and type 1 bipolar disorder. In order to select the best predictors within the entirety of the signals, and the full extent of the available information, in addition to using conventional ERG parameters, two new approaches for extracting non-conventional retinal signal descriptors were implemented. Mappings of predictors demonstrate that meaningful classifiers are located in areas of the retinal signal that have never been investigated before, allowing a multiplicity of biomarkers to be extracted, all well scattered within the entire volume of information, as opposed to the conventional ERG components which are very sparce and discrete. RSPA prediction models minimum accuracy was 79% and maximum 99% for training, and 68% and 90%, respectively, for testing, depending upon the model used, as compared to 73% and 87% for training, and 55% and 61% for the testing dataset with the prediction models using conventional ERG parameters alone. The prediction models with the highest testing performance were found using Ridge logistic regression with either photopic MA, ARMA or signal density polynomial coefficients predictors. Meaningful testing performances were also obtained with logistic regression (90%), neural network (88%) and SVM (86%) analysis methods. These results demonstrate that using only conventional ERG parameters is a very limited approach in prediction model development, because it excludes most of the retinal signal where many specific details are the most performing classifiers. Our findings support the concept of high-density retinal signal and its purpose, while many research groups attempt to decipher retinal signals to differentiate between complex pathologies, such as psychiatric disorders, to select biosignatures as objective evidence for their diagnoses.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,616
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,476

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle