MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406330151 · doi:10.2196/58509

Effectiveness of the Facility for Elderly Surveillance System (FESSy) in Two Public Health Center Jurisdictions in Japan: Prospective Observational Study

2025· article· en· W4406330151 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Junko Kurita, Aya Ogiwara, Yurina Saito, Asami Sunadori, Tomoko Hayashi, Yukari Kawana, Tamie Sugawara, Yoshiyuki Sugishita, Fujiko Irie, Naomi Sakurai

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCOVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic healthMedicineOutbreakPublic health surveillanceObservational studyGovernment (linguistics)Medical emergencyEnvironmental healthCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)NursingDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Residents of facilities for older people are vulnerable to COVID-19 outbreaks. Nevertheless, timely recognition of outbreaks at facilities for older people at public health centers has been impossible in Japan since May 8, 2023, when the Japanese government discontinued aggressive countermeasures against COVID-19 because of the waning severity of the dominant Omicron strain. The Facility for Elderly Surveillance System (FESSy) has been developed to improve information collection. Objective: This study examined FESSy experiences and effectiveness in two public health center jurisdictions in Japan. Methods: This study assessed the use by public health centers of the detection mode of an automated AI detection system (ie, FESSy AI), as well as manual detection by the public health centers' staff (ie, FESSy staff) and direct reporting by facilities to the public health centers. We considered the following aspects: (1) diagnoses or symptoms, (2) numbers of patients as of their detection date, and (3) ultimate numbers of patients involved in incidents. Subsequently, effectiveness was assessed and compared based on detection modes. The study lasted from June 1, 2023, through January 2024. Results: In both areas, this study examined 31 facilities at which 87 incidents were detected. FESSy (AI or staff) detected significantly fewer patients than non-FESSy methods, that is, direct reporting to the public health center of the detection date and ultimate number of patients. Conclusions: FESSy was superior to direct reporting from facilities for the number of patients as of the detection date and for the ultimate outbreak size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical InformaticsSame topicCOVID-19 Digital Contact TracingFrench-language works237,207