MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406336850 · doi:10.1080/00032719.2024.2449556

Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) for the Characterization of Bacterial Isolates in Pus

2025· article· en· W4406336850 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Zohaib, Aleena Shahzadi, Muhammad Irfan Majeed, Haq Nawaz, Muhammad Aamir Aslam, Abdulrahman Alshammari, Norah A. Albekairi, Arslan Ali, Sadia Arshad, Arslan Yousaf, Sonia Yaseen, R. E. Van Atta, Rana Muhammad Sabir Tariq, Saqib Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCharacterization (materials science)Raman spectroscopySurface-enhanced Raman spectroscopySpectroscopySurface (topology)Analytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyRaman scatteringOpticsChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study utilized SERS to characterize and identify Klebsiella pneumonia, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa which were collected from pus and confirmed using 16S rRNA sequencing. These bacteria are typically cultured and isolated from human wounds. SERS peaks at 575, 629, 930, 1008, 1038, 1099, 1134, 1221, 1283, 1294, 1374, 1589, and 1707 cm−1 were shown to be distinguishing features of these strains. Principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares – discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was applied to SERS spectral datasets. This study demonstrates that combining SERS with PCA and PLS-DA is effective for recognizing and distinguishing these bacterial isolates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical LettersSame topicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207