MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406345613 · doi:10.1109/tase.2025.3529283

Automated Sperm Tracking and Immobilization With a Clinically-Compatible XYZ Stage

2025· article· en· W4406345613 on OpenAlexafffund
Haocong Song, Wen‐Yuan Chen, Guanqiao Shan, Changsheng Dai, Steven Yang, Aojun Jiang, Hang Liu, Zhuoran Zhang, Yu Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsSpermComputer scienceTracking (education)EngineeringControl engineeringBiomedical engineeringMedicineAndrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automated positioning systems play a pivotal role in micro-scale cell manipulation. In clinical intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for infertility treatment, a motile sperm needs to be immobilized by glass micropipette tapping for subsequent surgical steps. The process requires accurate tracking of the target sperm and precise alignment between the sperm tail and the micropipette. Manual sperm immobilization suffers from inconsistent success rates, and current robotic systems developed for the task fail to comply with the standard clinical setup. Instead of using a motorized micromanipulator as in existing robotic systems, this paper presents an automated and compact three-dimensional (3-D) positioning stage for sperm immobilization that can be seamlessly integrated into standard clinical platforms. To tackle the challenge of accurately tracking the target sperm with degraded detection quality due to the complex 3-D motion of the positioning stage, a multi-stage sperm tracking scheme is designed for detection-to-tracklet association. To prevent physical contact between the sperm head and the micropipette, an adaptive tail-tapping planning strategy based on the sperm head orientation analysis is established. A visual servo controller equipped with a dynamic sperm motion observer is further employed to achieve precise positioning of the target sperm during the immobilization process. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed system achieved a sperm tracking accuracy of 88.12%, and a sperm positioning accuracy of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2.3~\pm ~1.2~\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula> m. Further experiments revealed the system achieved a success rate of 93.5% and a time cost of 5.5 s for automated sperm immobilization. Note to Practitioners—This work presents an automated positioning system for the robotic immobilization of live human sperm in the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) process. Conventional robotic systems developed for sperm immobilization use motorized stages which only provide two degrees of freedom (DOF) and disturb standard clinical setups with bulky sizes and additional equipment. Leveraging the advantages of piezoelectric positioners, a compact 3-D positioning system is developed to perform robotic sperm immobilization in an all-in-one manner. A sperm immobilization tracker is developed to track the target sperm during the immobilization process. The proposed multi-stage data association metric can effectively resist the noisy detection results due to occlusion and out-of-focus blur introduced by the 3-D movement of the positioning stage. Based on the analysis of the sperm head orientation, an adaptive tail-tapping planning strategy is established to avoid the risk of contacting the sperm head where DNA is contained. The developed positioning system can be easily integrated into a standard microscopy operation platform for biological cell manipulation. The proposed tracking scheme is applicable in various microscopy cell analysis scenarios where the detection results are inevitably affected by the degraded image quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and EngineeringSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207