MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406347215 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2025.3528644

E2E Network Slice Assurance for B5G/6G: Realizing Data Collection and Management, MLOps, and Closed-Loop Control

2025· article· en· W4406347215 on OpenAlexaff
Simona Marinova, Alberto Leon‐Garcia

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTelecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoop (graph theory)Computer scienceClosed loopQuality assuranceWaferData collectionControl (management)Reliability engineeringControl theory (sociology)Operations managementArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematicsControl engineeringElectrical engineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Assurance for network slices is a cornerstone for emerging application verticals such as vehicle-to-everything (V2X) and Industry 5.0. To achieve per-slice Service Level Agreement (SLA) assurance, an efficient network slice assurance framework is required. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end (E2E) slice assurance framework that addresses the requirements of assurance use cases. We design and implement the major components for a slice assurance framework for the E2E network: data collection, MLOps, and closed-control loops. We leverage open-source software to build the framework, and we provide experimental evaluations on real network devices and datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications SocietySame topicTelecommunications and Broadcasting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207