MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406347215 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2025.3528644

E2E Network Slice Assurance for B5G/6G: Realizing Data Collection and Management, MLOps, and Closed-Loop Control

2025· article· en· W4406347215 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTelecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoop (graph theory)Computer scienceClosed loopQuality assuranceWaferData collectionControl (management)Reliability engineeringControl theory (sociology)Operations managementArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematicsControl engineeringElectrical engineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Assurance for network slices is a cornerstone for emerging application verticals such as vehicle-to-everything (V2X) and Industry 5.0. To achieve per-slice Service Level Agreement (SLA) assurance, an efficient network slice assurance framework is required. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end (E2E) slice assurance framework that addresses the requirements of assurance use cases. We design and implement the major components for a slice assurance framework for the E2E network: data collection, MLOps, and closed-control loops. We leverage open-source software to build the framework, and we provide experimental evaluations on real network devices and datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it