Opportunities in the synfuels industry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reports from a meeting on opportunities in the synfuels industry are presented. Topics included: prospects and constraints in the use of coal in Italy; Australian coals in the domestic and international energy scenes, the present and future; update on the synfuels industry in the republic of South Africa; a comparative techno-economic analysis of coprocessing, direct coal liquefaction and resid upgrading; review and update of the coal fired diesel engine; German coals; utilisation now and in future; Canadian coal export future; coal gasification combined cycle power generation enhancement with methanol; the outlook for coal in Korea; US coal export opportunities; coal opportunities in Eastern Europe; world oil price and how it relates to future coal mine development; the technologies of the clean coal technology demonstration program; use of oil shale waste in a circulating fluid bed; synfuels in Japan; beneficiation by oil agglomeration of center North Dakota lignite; healy clean coal project; the future coal in southeast Asia; global perspectives; and fluid bed operations to date. Individual projects are processed separately on the data bases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".