MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Surveillance Cultures for Hospital‐Associated Infections

2023· other· en· W4406352266 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie Gumbis, Rachel D. Aubert, Dawn Sievert, William Lainhart, Johann Pitout, Helen Bibbi, Sam Bourassa‐Blancette, Shawn R. Lockhart, Daniel A. Green, Hannah Imlay, Kimberly E. Hanson

Bibliographic record

VenueClinMicroNow · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPseudomonas aeruginosaAntibioticsLife expectancyInfection controlAntibiotic resistanceHealth carePublic healthMedicineIntensive care medicineDiseaseMicrobiologyBiologyEnvironmental healthBacteriaPolitical scienceNursingInternal medicineGeneticsPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Antibiotic and antifungal resistance (AR)—the ability of bacteria and fungi to defeat the drugs designed to kill them—is one of the greatest global public health challenges. Antibiotics and antifungals are among our most powerful tools for fighting life‐threatening infections. The threat of AR undermines progress in health care, food production, and life expectancy. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is a leader in the fight against this global threat, driving aggressive action along with partners and facilitating collaborative responses to resistance through a One Health approach. State and local health care‐associated infection (HAI)/AR programs are essential to U.S. efforts to detect, prevent, respond to, and contain HAI and AR pathogens. In 2019, CDC evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of many carbapenem‐resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa antimicrobial susceptibility testing phenotypes to determine which were most predictive of the presence of carbapenemase genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinMicroNowSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207