Real-World Insights Into Dementia Diagnosis Trajectory and Clinical Practice Patterns Unveiled by Natural Language Processing: Development and Usability Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Understanding the dementia disease trajectory and clinical practice patterns in outpatient settings is vital for effective management. Knowledge about the path from initial memory loss complaints to dementia diagnosis remains limited. Objective: This study aims to (1) determine the time intervals between initial memory loss complaints and dementia diagnosis in outpatient care, (2) assess the proportion of patients receiving cognition-enhancing medication prior to dementia diagnosis, and (3) identify patient and provider characteristics that influence the time between memory complaints and diagnosis and the prescription of cognition-enhancing medication. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used a large outpatient electronic health record (EHR) database from the University of Connecticut Health Center, covering 2010-2018, with a cohort of 581 outpatients. We used a customized deep learning-based natural language processing (NLP) pipeline to extract clinical information from EHR data, focusing on cognition-related symptoms, primary caregiver relation, and medication usage. We applied descriptive statistics, linear, and logistic regression for analysis. Results: The NLP pipeline showed precision, recall, and F1-scores of 0.97, 0.93, and 0.95, respectively. The median time from the first memory loss complaint to dementia diagnosis was 342 (IQR 200-675) days. Factors such as the location of initial complaints and diagnosis and primary caregiver relationships significantly affected this interval. Around 25.1% (146/581) of patients were prescribed cognition-enhancing medication before diagnosis, with the number of complaints influencing medication usage. Conclusions: Our NLP-guided analysis provided insights into the clinical pathways from memory complaints to dementia diagnosis and medication practices, which can enhance patient care and decision-making in outpatient settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.045 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".