MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406354106 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3529633

Efficient Neural 3-D Localization in Asynchronous and Nonideal 5G+ Networks: Cramèr-Rao Bound Analysis

2025· article· en· W4406354106 on OpenAlexaff
Deeb Assad Tubail, Mohammed Zourob, Salama Ikki

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAsynchronous communicationIdeal (ethics)Cramér–Rao boundArtificial neural networkUpper and lower boundsAlgorithmTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceMathematicsEstimation theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work addresses two innovative and challenging aspects in the pursuit of an accurate localization process, which can be achieved through a complex and nonlinear approach such as neural networks (NNs). This study specifically focuses on developing a low-complexity localization method using NNs, along with presenting the associated Cramèr-Rao lower bound (CRB). The research considers real-world scenarios where system performance is corrupted by imperfect synchronization and hardware impairments (HWIs), which cause significant accuracy reduction when using traditional estimators. The NN approach offers a promising solution to counteract the effects of HWI and synchronization issues, by using substantial prior information during the training phase. However, incorporating this prior information and dealing with the nonlinearity of NNs presents challenges in deriving the CRB of the neural localization process. To overcome these challenges, the research utilizes the f-divergence function and the concept of mutual information to derive the CRB, making it applicable to various HWI, nonlinear activation functions in NNs and statistical models. The study further simplifies the optimization problem traditionally associated with this approach used in calculating the CRB. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves a low-complexity and accurate localization process even in asynchronous and impaired systems. Furthermore, the simulations validate the proposed CRB driving technique and provide the CRB values for various neural localization scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207