Le groupe Maria’M : une pratique de dialogue entre féministes chrétiennes et musulmanes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine le dialogue interreligieux et féministe au sein du groupe Maria’M, composé de femmes chrétiennes et musulmanes au Québec. Il met en lumière la diversité des perspectives féministes et religieuses au sein du groupe, soulignant les efforts pour concilier ces identités multiples. Les discussions abordent des thèmes tels que la justice sociale, le féminisme, la place des femmes dans les traditions religieuses et la décolonisation du féminisme. Les membres du groupe réfléchissent également à la manière dont leurs croyances influencent leur engagement féministe et leur vision d’un monde plus juste. L’étude souligne le rôle crucial du dialogue interreligieux dans la création d’une solidarité entre les femmes de diverses traditions, favorisant ainsi une compréhension mutuelle et promouvant la diversité comme valeur centrale de leur engagement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".