MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406360022 · doi:10.1101/2025.01.13.25320471

Estradiol-based Menopausal Hormone Therapy is associated with improved episodic and prospective memory scores in the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging

2025· preprint· en· W4406360022 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCognitive Functions and Memory
Canadian institutionsSpringboard (Canada)Health Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoBrock UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of Canada
KeywordsMenopauseProspective cohort studyProspective memoryHormone therapyEpisodic memoryMedicineEstrogenCognitionHormone replacement therapy (female-to-male)Longitudinal studyCognitive declineInternal medicineVerbal memoryPsychologyDementiaTestosterone (patch)Breast cancerDiseaseCancerPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Menopause and menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) can influence cognition in postmenopausal women, but previous literature remains equivocal about their effects. MHT varies based on formulation and route of administration, both of which influence dose of estradiol (E2), the estrogen with the greatest affinity to the estrogen receptor. Transdermal E2 avoids hepatic conversion and results in higher plasma levels of E2 than oral E2 formulations. The cognitive domains of executive functions, episodic memory and prospective memory are diminished with age, but may be differentially sensitive to MHT, dependent on the brain regions recruited during the task. There is a lack of research investigating the effects of the age of menopause and estradiol (E2)-based MHT on different cognitive domains. Methods Using baseline data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging, we examined the associations between age of menopause and E2 based MHT on performance in three cognitive domains: episodic memory, prospective memory, and executive functions. Our cohort included 7,251 postmenopausal women who were cognitively healthy, with models adjusted for age, education, and body mass index. Results Earlier age at menopause was significantly associated with lower scores across all cognitive domains. However, for the executive functions domain, an earlier age of menopause was associated with lower scores only in those with grand parity (4 or more children) and there was a greater effect size among APOE ε4 carriers. We found that transdermal E2 was associated with higher episodic memory scores, whereas oral E2 was associated with higher prospective memory scores compared to no MHT. Neither administration route significantly affected executive function. Conclusion These results highlight the differential effects of E2-based MHT depending on route of administration and cognitive domain, and underscore the importance of considering age of menopause and individual characteristics such as reproductive history and genotype status. This work provides clarity to inconsistencies in the literature and informs the development of precision medicine approaches for cognitive aging in postmenopausal people.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it