MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406363073 · doi:10.3390/ma18020358

Large Improvements in the Thermoelectric Properties of SnSe by Fast Cooling

2025· article· en· W4406363073 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew Golabek, Nikhil K. Barua, Ehsan Niknam, Luke T. Menezes, Holger Kleinke

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpark plasma sinteringMaterials scienceThermoelectric effectSeebeck coefficientThermoelectric materialsThermal conductivityFigure of meritElectrical resistivity and conductivityAnalytical Chemistry (journal)SemiconductorQuenching (fluorescence)DopingComposite materialSinteringOptoelectronicsThermodynamicsChemistryElectrical engineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As reported during the last five years, SnSe is one of the leading thermoelectric (TE) materials with a very low lattice thermal conductivity. However, its elements are not as heavy as those of classical thermoelectric materials like PbTe or Bi2Te3. Its outstanding TE properties were revealed after repeated purification steps to minimize the amount of oxygen contamination, followed by spark plasma sintering. Recently, we showed that hot-pressing—once optimized—can yield comparable or even better TE performance using the examples of Na- and Cu- as well as Na- and Ag-co-doped SnSe. However, long-term stability remains a challenge during cycling between low and high temperatures. Here, we investigated whether the cooling procedure has a significant impact on the thermoelectric properties of SnSe. We compared cooling of the melt with a 1:1 ratio of Sn:Se from 1273 K down to room temperature in air with quenching in water. As typical for undoped SnSe, both materials were extrinsic p-type semiconductors due to Sn defects. The air-quenched sample exhibited higher thermal conductivity, lower electrical conductivity, and higher Seebeck coefficient, all consistent with a smaller number of defects and thus a smaller number of charge carriers due to the slower cooling procedure. This resulted in a comparatively low peak figure-of-merit value zT of 0.61 at 823 K for the air-quenched sample, compared to the substantially higher peak zT of 1.58 at 813 K for the water-quenched sample.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterialsSame topicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and DevicesFrench-language works237,207