MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406365579 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2024-0213

Freshwater life-cycle timing of Pacific salmon and steelhead (<i>Oncorhynchus</i> spp.) in Canada

2025· article· en· W4406365579 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Samantha M. Wilson, Stephanie J. Peacock

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOncorhynchusFisheryRange (aeronautics)JuvenilePopulationGeographyPhenologyRainbow troutLife historyEcologyLatitudeBiologyFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Information on species’ phenology and distribution is essential for assessing and mitigating exposure to pressures that vary over space and time, such as development projects or climate changes. Pacific salmon ( Oncorhynchus spp.) have complex life cycles that span freshwater and marine environments and unfold over several years and many thousands of kilometers. Currently, there is no central repository of life-cycle timing for salmon and steelhead populations throughout their Canadian range, hindering conservation and recovery efforts. To fill this gap, we have compiled timing data for fry migration from incubation to rearing grounds, juvenile migration from rearing grounds to the ocean, adult entry into rivers, and spawning for salmon and steelhead from British Columbia and the Yukon, Canada. For each species, we analysed the compiled data using linear models to describe patterns in population-specific timing across latitude, distance from the ocean, river gradient, and life-history types. Although we found significant data gaps in remote regions, our compiled dataset represents the best-available information on life-history timing that can inform environmental planning and salmon conservation actions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→