MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406366944 · doi:10.1148/radiol.233030

A Machine Learning Model Using Cardiac CT and MRI Data Predicts Cardiovascular Events in Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

2025· article· en· W4406366944 on OpenAlexaff
Théo Pezel, Solenn Toupin, Valérie Bousson, Kenza Hamzi, Thomas Hovasse, Thierry Lefèvre, Bernard Chevalier, Thierry Unterseeh, Francesca Sanguineti, Stéphane Champagne, Hakim Benamer, Antoinette Neylon, Mariama Akodad, Tania Ah-Sing, Lounis Hamzi, Trecy Gonçalves, Antoine Léquipar, Emmanuel Gall, Alexandre Unger, Jean Guillaume Dillinger, Patrick Henry, O. Vignaux, Marc Sirol, Philippe Garot, Jérôme Garot

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCoronary artery diseaseCardiologyInternal medicineDiseaseRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

value range, <.001 to .004). The ML model also exhibited good performance in the two external validation datasets (AUC, 0.84 and 0.92). Conclusion An ML model including both CCTA and stress cardiac MRI data demonstrated better performance in predicting MACE than traditional methods and existing scores in patients with newly diagnosed CAD. © RSNA, 2025

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiologySame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207