MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406375608 · doi:10.1039/d4eb00016a

Elucidating the impact of metal doping in Li<sub>1.15</sub>(Ni<sub>0.35</sub>Mn<sub>0.65</sub>)<sub>0.85</sub>O<sub>2</sub> cathodes using high-throughput experiments and machine learning

2025· article· en· W4406375608 on OpenAlexafffund
Alex Hebert, Nooshin Zeinali Galabi, J. Michael Sieffert, Maxime Blangero, Eric McCalla

Bibliographic record

VenueEES batteries. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCathodeDissolutionMaterials scienceDopingTransition metalThroughputSustainable energyNanotechnologyEngineering physicsOptoelectronicsPhysical chemistryComputer scienceChemistryElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringTelecommunicationsRenewable energyCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To improve sustainable Li-ion cathodes, materials with high energy and low transition metal dissolution are needed. High-throughput experiments coupled to machine-learning are used to accelerate the design of Co-free Li-rich materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEES batteries.Same topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207