MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406379769 · doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1527053

Editorial: Methods in respiratory pharmacology 2023

2025· editorial· en· W4406379769 on OpenAlexaff
Nadia Milad, Giulio Cabrini, Maria Cordina

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Pharmacology · 2025
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacologyMedicineClinical pharmacologyRespiratory systemSafety pharmacologyDrugInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dear Readers, It is our great pleasure to introduce the Research Topic "Methods in Respiratory Pharmacology 2023," featured in this special issue of Frontiers in Pharmacology. This collection underscores innovative methodologies, reflecting advancements that shape our understanding and treatment of respiratory diseases.Respiratory pharmacology has significantly transformed with the development of sophisticated in vitro models and novel therapeutic strategies. This Research Topic encapsulates these advancements, providing valuable insights into experimental models and potential therapeutic agents that hold promise for improving patient outcomes.One of the key contributions to this collection is the article "3D Cell Culture Models in Research: Applications to Lung Cancer Pharmacology." Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancerrelated mortality worldwide, necessitating innovative research methodologies to improve treatment outcomes. The advent of 3D cell culture techniques has marked a significant advancement in lung cancer research, offering more physiologically relevant models compared to traditional 2D cultures. These 3D models, including spheroids, organoids, and engineered tissue models, play pivotal roles in enhancing our understanding of lung cancer biology, facilitating drug development, and advancing precision medicine. By more closely mirroring human lung tumors, these models pave the way for more effective and personalized therapeutic strategies. Read the full article here.Another notable manuscript is "A Novel In Vitro Cell Model of the Proteinase/Antiproteinase Balance Observed in Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency." Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a genetic condition that disrupts the proteinase/antiproteinase balance, leading to emphysema. Predicting and assessing human responses to therapeutic candidates from preclinical animal studies have been challenging. This study developed a physiologically relevant in vitro model of the proteinase/antiproteinase balance and assessed its predictive power for pharmacological efficacy. The results support an inhibitor threshold above which the activity footprint generation appears resistant to increasing dosage, helping test inhibitors and assess NSP activity in emphysema. Explore this study in detail.The issue also includes a significant clinical study titled "The Use of Antibiotics in the Early Stage of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD) in Patients Without Obvious Signs of Infection: A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Controlled Study." The use of antibiotics in the early stage of AECOPD in patients without obvious signs of infection is a contentious issue. This multicenter, randomized, parallel controlled study sought to clarify whether this treatment method, in the absence of clear infections indicators, has an impact on short-and long-term prognosis of AECOPD patients. The study found that while overall rates of exacerbation frequency, ICU treatment, and mortality were not significantly different between the antibiotic and nonantibiotic groups, the 30-day readmission rate was lower in the antibiotic group. Additionally, patients in the antibiotic group had shorter hospital stays and lower CRP levels and sputum viscosity at the 30-day follow-up, suggesting that antibiotics may improve short-term outcomes in specific subsets of AECOPD patients. Read the full study here.Lastly, the article "Vandetanib as a Prospective Anti-inflammatory and Anti-contractile Agent in Asthma" explores the therapeutic potential of Vandetanibvandetanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in treating asthma. Vandetanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, primarily exerts therapeutic effects in lung cancers, but its potential benefits in asthma were unclear. This study investigated vandetanib's anticontractile and anti-inflammatory properties in asthma, where in vivo experiments in an asthmatic mouse model showed that vandetanib alleviates systemic inflammation and various airway pathological changes, including hypersensitivity, hypersecretion, and remodeling. In vitro experiments demonstrated that vandetanib relaxes precontracted tracheal rings via calcium mobilization regulated by specific ion channels. These findings suggest the feasibility of using vandetanib to reduce abnormal airway contraction and systemic inflammation in asthma. Discover more about this research.The contributions to this Research Topic underscore the dynamic and interdisciplinary nature of respiratory pharmacology. They reflect ongoing efforts to develop more effective treatments for respiratory diseases through innovative research and collaborative endeavors. We extend our gratitude to all authors and reviewers for their invaluable contributions and insights.As editors, we are excited to share these advancements with the scientific community and hope this collection inspires further research and innovation in respiratory pharmacology. We invite you to explore these articles and engage with the groundbreaking work presented in this special issue.Best regards, Nadia Milad, PhD; Maria Cordina, PhD; and Guilio Cabrini, PhD

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0090.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PharmacologySame topicInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207