Digestive and absorptive capacity and digesta microbiota throughout the gastrointestinal tract of nursery pigs from parents with divergent estimated breeding value for feed conversion ratio
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated digestive and absorptive function changes and microbiota adaptations during weaning in nursery pigs from parents with divergent estimated breeding values for feed conversion ratio (EBV_FCR). The research aimed to investigate whether these changes differed between two groups: pigs from high EBV_FCR (low efficiency, LE) parents and pigs from low EBV_FCR (high efficiency, HE) parents. Furthermore, digesta samples from duodenum, jejunum, ileum, colon, and cecum were collected from 56-day-old post-weaned pigs and subjected to microbiota analysis using 16S rRNA gene profiling. Enzyme activity kinetics and gene expression analyses of nutrient transporters in various segments of the digestive tract showed no significant differences between the two groups. Tight junction proteins gene expression also showed no significant differences in the jejunum between the two groups. Microbiota analysis revealed consistent dominance of Firmicutes in the jejunum and ileum, with Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes prevalent in the cecum and colon across both groups. However, significant differences were observed at the genus level. Lactobacillus was predominant in the small intestine of HE pigs, while the large intestine of LE pigs harbored higher levels of Prevotella, Streptococcus, and Blautia compared to HE pigs. These differences suggest potential functional differences that warrant further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".