Programa SONQO-CALCHAQUÍ III (Edición 2023): evaluación de variables cardiovasculares en comunidades originarias de los Valles Calchaquíes (Noroeste Argentino)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Previous reports of our work group demonstrated that the native population of Quilmes (Tucumán) has a high rate of overweight and obesity and a Western pattern diet. The 2023 SONQO-CALCHAQUÍ III program was designed to evaluate whether these characteristics are shared by other native communities in the Calchaqui Valleys. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cardiovascular variables in three native communities of the Calchaqui Valleys and their possible differences. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in the communities of Cachi, Colalao del Valle and Fuerte Quemado. The participants answered questionnaires and were evaluated with electrocardiogram, anthropometric determinations and endurance and muscular strength testing. Results: A total of 819 inhabitants were included (Cachi: 292; Colalao del Valle: 251; Fuerte Quemado: 276). Mean age was 52.9 ± 0.6 years. A high proportion of patients had not checked their cardiovascular risk factors; 39.5% were overweight, 28.1% were obese, 38.9% had normal waist circumference; 9.5% presented carotid atherosclerotic plaques and 39.1% had reduced hand grip strength. The Edmonton Scale revealed that the population was non-frail. The Mini-Mental test indicated mild to moderate cognitive impairment. Colalao del Valle had the best health status but residents of Fuerte Quemado had better sleep quality and self-esteem. Conclusions: The population is not homogeneous, and each community has its own characteristics. In general, physical fitness is acceptable, but the rate of overweight and obesity is high, regardless of the community in which they live, indicating a Western diet pattern. There are, however, local factors with a protective role in cardiovascular disease that should be further investigated in this population. Keywords: Native population - South America - Middle and high mountains - Cardiovascular variables - Epidemiology How to cite this article: Galdeano RS, Vogelmann OA, Mauro SO, Scattini G, Alderete R, Pastore FA, y cols. 2023 SONQO-CALCHAQUÍ III Program: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Variables in Native Communities of the Calchaqui Valleys (Northwest Argentina). Rev Argent Cardiol 2024;92:419-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.7775/rac.v92.i6.20847
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".