Back Propagation Neural Network model for analysis of hyperspectral images to predict apple firmness
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The potential of employing hyperspectral imaging (HSI) in the near-infrared (NIR) range (386.82−1,004.50 nm) for predicting the firmness of 'Fuji' apples cultivated in Aksu has been evaluated. The performance of seven preprocessing algorithms and two feature selection algorithms was evaluated. The coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) and root mean square error (RMSE) of Partial Least Squares (PLS) models are contrasted using various inputs. These results confirm that the Multiplicative Scatter Correction (MSC) preprocessing algorithm was the optimal choice ($ {R}_{p}^{2} $ = 0.7925, <i>RMSEP</i> = 0.6537), and the Competitive Adaptive Reweighted Sampling (CARS) feature selection algorithm demonstrated superior performance ($ {R}_{p}^{2} $ = 0.8325, <i>RMSEP</i> = 0.6257). Based on the aforementioned findings, PLS, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Heterogeneous Transfer Learning (HTL), and Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) models were constructed for cross-validation purposes. The experimental results indicate that the CARS-BPNN model exhibits the optimal prediction performance, with an $ {R}_{p}^{2} $ value of 0.9350 and an <i>RMSEP</i> value of 0.4654. The results of the research indicated that a deep learning method combined with hyperspectral imaging technology could be utilized to non-destructively detect the firmness of 'Fuji' apples, which will be beneficial and potentially applicable for post-harvest fruit firmness monitoring. This research provides a reference point for the non-destructive detection of apple in the selection of preprocessing, feature selection algorithms, and predicting firmness model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it