MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406396618 · doi:10.32520/stmsi.v13i6.4635

Management of Inorganic Fertilizer Raw Materials PT Citra Sawit Indah Lestasi using EOQ

2024· article· en· W4406396618 on OpenAlexaff
Dailami Dasuki Siregar, Ahmad Muhazir

Bibliographic record

VenueSISTEMASI · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsRoyal Roads University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaw materialEconomic order quantityFertilizerWaste managementBusinessEnvironmental scienceAgricultural scienceChemistryEngineeringMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PT Citra Sawit Indah Lestari is a business operating in the oil palm plantation sector. Based on initial observations, it turns out that the supply of inorganic fertilizer raw materials at PT Citra Sawit Indah Lestari has not been planned properly so that one time the raw materials run out during the production process, it often happens that excess orders for inorganic fertilizer raw materials result in the raw materials not being able to be used. . And the storage warehouse is full, which will disrupt the operations of raw material collection by employees. The aim of this research is to apply Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) in controlling inorganic fertilizer raw materials at PT Citra Sawit Indah Lestari to maintain the stability of oil palm fruit production. The research method used in this research is qualitative research. The results of this research are that the system designed is in accordance with the needs of PT Citra Sawit Indah Lestari and makes work easier in controlling inorganic fertilizer raw materials. The conclusion is that the application of the Economic Order Quantity method in managing the supply of inorganic fertilizer raw materials at the web-based PT Citra Sawit Indah Lestari makes it easier for business owners to manage fertilizer supplies well so that it is easier to order goods in the next period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSISTEMASISame topicManagement and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207