MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406397571 · doi:10.3989/asclepio.2024.19

A shared tradition: transmitting maritime knowledge in print

2024· article· en· W4406397571 on OpenAlex
Margaret Schotte

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsclepio · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCurriculumPerspective (graphical)Tacit knowledgeSociologyHistoryVisual artsComputer sciencePedagogyKnowledge managementArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As Europeans ventured more frequently on transoceanic voyages in the 16th century, it became essential for navigators to be able to carry out mathematical computations. Iberian educators rose to the occasion, developing textbooks and curricula to transmit these abstract concepts. At the same time that they strove to present new mathematical techniques, these maritime authors also captured the tacit skills that had been practiced for centuries. Thus, even though few working sailors put pen to paper, it is possible to recover aspects of their epistemology from these texts. Because books traveled so easily across borders, these academic sources also had far-reaching effects, inspiring similar educational programs across maritime Europe. This article recommends adopting a comparative perspective, since much can be learned by tracing the evolution of these shared practices as they traveled from Spain and Portugal to the Netherlands, France, and England, and back again.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it