MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406401131 · doi:10.54254/2753-8818/2025.20348

Face Image Generation for Anime Characters based on Generative Adversarial Network

2025· article· en· W4406401131 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTheoretical and Natural Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimeFace (sociological concept)Adversarial systemGenerative grammarGenerative adversarial networkImage (mathematics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionNomaLinguisticsTelecommunicationsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the increasing demand for digital art, animation, and games, facial generation for anime characters has attracted growing research interest in recent years, which aims to build models to automatically generate unique and high-quality character images. Thanks to the rapid advancement of deep learning techniques, particularly generative adversarial networks, GAN-based image generation methods have continuously achieved breakthroughs in generation effectiveness and speed. Focusing on generating realistic anime face images, this paper proposes an anime character face image generation model based on GANs, which integrates Bath Normalization and Dropout to maintain strong stability and avoid overfitting. Comprehensive experiments show the efficacy of the proposed method, which can achieve high diversity in facial features and styles while maintaining visual coherence

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it