MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Observations of the Microphysics of Wintertime Mixed Phase Precipitation and Type, and Instrument Comparisons at Sorel, Quebec, Canada.

2025· preprint· en· W4406409051 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Faisal S. Boudala, Mathieu Lachapelle, George A. Isaac, Jason A. Milbrandt, Daniel Michelson, Robert D. Reed

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMixed phasePrecipitationPhase (matter)Environmental scienceClimatologyMeteorologyAtmospheric sciencesGeologyGeographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wintertime mixed-phase precipitation (P) impacts transportation, electric power grids, and homes. Forecasting winter precipitation such as freezing precipitation (ZP), freezing rain (ZR), freezing drizzle (ZL), ice pellets (IP), and the snow (S) and rain (R) boundary remains challenging due to the complex cloud microphysical and dynamical processes involved, which are difficult to predict in current numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. Understanding these processes based on observations is crucial for improving NWP models. To aid this effort, Environment and Climate Change Canada deployed specialized instruments such as the Vaisala FD71P and OTT PARSIVEL disdrometers, which measure P type (PT), particle size distribution (N(D)), and fall velocity (V). The liquid water content (LWC) and mean mass weighted diameter ( D_m ) were derived based on the PARSIVEL data during the ZP events. Additionally, a Micro Rain Radar (MRR) and an OTT Pluvio2 P gauge were used as part of the Winter Precipitation Type Research Multi-Scale Experiment project at Sorel, Quebec. The dataset included manual measurements of snow water equivalent (SWE), PT, and radiosonde profiles. Analysis revealed that the FD71P and PARSIVEL instruments generally agreed in detecting P and snow events. However, the FD71P tended to overestimate ZR and underestimate IP, while the PARSIVEL showed superior detection of R, ZR, and S. Conversely, the FD71P performed better in identifying ZL These discrepancies may stem from uncertainties in the velocity-diameter (V-D) relationship used to diagnose ZR and IP. Observations from the MRR, radiosondes, and surface data linked ZR and IP events to melting layers (ML). IP events were associated with colder surface temperatures (T) compared to ZP events. Most ZR and ZL occurrences were characterized by light P with low LWC and specific intensity and D_m thresholds. Additionally, snow events were more common at warmer T compared to liquid P under low surface relative humidity conditions. The Pluvio2 gauge significantly underestimated snowfall compared to optical probes and manual measurements. However, snowfall estimates derived from PARSIVEL data, adjusted for snow density to account for riming effects, closely matched measurements from the FD71P and manual observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.orgSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207