MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406412010 · doi:10.37767/2362-5325(2024)004

Responsabilidad solidaria de los "influencers"

2025· article· en· W4406412010 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Franco Carrara

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Derecho Privado │Universidad Blas Pascal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicStress and Burnout Research
Canadian institutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfluencer marketingBusinessMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It proposes a legislative amendment to Article 40 of the Consumer Protection Law No. 24,240 to explicitly include influencers with strict and joint liability. Article 40. If consumer harm results from a defect or risk associated with the product or the provision of the service, liability shall extend to the producer, manufacturer, importer, distributor, supplier, influencer, seller, and anyone who has placed their brand on the product or service. The carrier shall be liable for any damage caused to the product arising from or during the service. Liability is joint and several, without prejudice to the right to seek recourse from others. Only those who can demonstrate that the cause of the damage was beyond their control may be released from liability, in whole or in part.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Derecho Privado │Universidad Blas PascalSame topicStress and Burnout ResearchFrench-language works237,207