MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406417209 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2025.3529659

Joint Interference Management and Traffic Offloading in Integrated Terrestrial and Non-Terrestrial Networks

2025· article· en· W4406417209 on OpenAlexaff
Mahfuzur Rahman, Md. Zoheb Hassan, Jeffrey H. Reed, Lingjia Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterference (communication)Joint (building)Computer scienceComputer networkTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exponential growth of data traffic beyond the 5G era necessitates improved resource utilization for the integrated terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks (ITNTN). In this work, we consider a multi-user multiple input multiple output (MU-MIMO)-empowered 5G ITNTN network consisting of terrestrial 5G and multi-beam geostationary earth orbit (GEO) satellite-based gNBs and develop an interference management framework that allows multiple users to receive downlink data over the same resource blocks (RB) simultaneously. Our developed framework first employs a traffic offloading algorithm by leveraging the reference signal received power (RSRP) and celledge width criteria to offload traffic from terrestrial to NTN networks. Subsequently, we formulate the resultant interference management as a joint power allocation and user-RB scheduling optimization problem to maximize the network’s spectral efficiency. Since the joint optimization problem is NP-hard and computationally intractable, a fractional programming-based solution is developed to obtain sub-optimal yet efficient transmit power allocation and user scheduling at terrestrial and satellite gNBs. A realistic ITNTN simulator is developed for performance evaluation by considering 3GPP channel models, antenna gains, and 5G RB numerology in rural terrestrial-GEO coexistence scenarios. Extensive simulation results confirm the efficacy of the proposed framework in managing interference and improving resource utilization at 5G ITNTN networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207