MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Machine Learning Methodologies for Predicting Fake News on Social Media X: A Comparative Investigation Over TruthSeeker Dataset

2024· article· en· W4406417548 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Happy Happy, Asif Iqubal, Subodh Kant Tiwari, Mithun Kumar Paswan, Sikander Azad, Pragti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMisinformation and Its Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial mediaComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningData scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this era of social media, where every piece of information is at the user's fingertips, anyone who has smart devices and an internet connection can access or create a new piece of information online on these social media sites with just a single click. This changes the delivery of news and how people stay informed. These days, individuals can receive breaking reports on their preferred social media sites without relying on traditional news broadcasting methods. This changes the method by which news is accessed and communicated in the modern internet era. But with this new way of getting information from social media platforms comes the new challenge of determining the credibility and accuracy of the information shared. Most of the time, fake news without proper fact-finding and misinformation can spread quickly, causing confusion and distrust among the public. This kind of fraudulent story is perhaps the foremost risk to any government and may cause social unrest and instability. In this research, our goal is to analyze and predict fraudulent news identification over digital platforms, especially the ‘X’, also known as 'Twitter, to create a reliable and efficient system that can identify fake news in real-time with high accuracy using machine learning algorithms on the CIC's (Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity's) truth seeker database of 2023. The proposed system is able to recognize fraudulent information across social platforms with its highest 99.97%accuracy using LR and MLP machine learning algorithms, which is much higher as compared to the existing benchmark studies. Further, this proposed system helps to ensure the detection of bogus headlines over various digital media platforms with the highest accuracy, which minimizes the impact of misleading information and safeguards users from being deceived, which helps us to curb the spread of fraudulent breaking news and prevent potential harm to society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.361
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.105 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMisinformation and Its ImpactsFrench-language works237,207